ReviewMicromachines2026
A Framework for Short-Range Wireless Power and Data Transfer in Miniaturized High-Power, High-Bandwidth Implants.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As implantable medical devices become increasingly miniaturized while demanding higher power levels, longer lifetimes, and larger data throughput, conventional powering and communication approaches are reaching their practical limits. Consequently, wireless power and data transfer have emerged as key enabling technologies for next-generation implantable systems. However, designing wireless links that simultaneously satisfy these requirements while remaining compact, efficient, and safe remains a significant challenge. To address this, this paper introduces an exploration and evaluation framework for selecting and co-designing short-range wireless power and data transfer technologies in medical devices such as cochlear and retinal implants. Guided by application requirements and relevant safety standards, the framework evaluates candidate technologies based on their operating principles, performance, and integration complexity. Based on this analysis, resonant inductive coupling is identified as the preferred approach for wireless power transfer, while both coil-based and antenna-based solutions are considered for wireless data transfer. Additionally, the paper compares architectures for integrated wireless power and data transfer, including both single- and multiple-link designs, and reviews strategies for uplink communication. The framework aims to guide the development of future sensory neuroprostheses that are smaller, safer, and capable of higher performance through optimized wireless link design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.