ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Target-Product and Translational Design Principles for Inhalable RNA Nanomedicines.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhalable ribonucleic acid (RNA) nanomedicines are emerging as versatile therapeutics for respiratory diseases and pulmonary metastases, enabling localized delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense oligonucleotides, microRNA (miRNA) mimics, self-amplifying RNA, and genome-editing systems. This review synthesizes the available evidence and argues that the field has moved beyond asking whether RNA can reach the lungs. The more consequential translational question is whether RNA cargo, nanocarrier, excipients, manufacturing process, inhalation device, and pulmonary target cell can be integrated into a reproducible therapeutic product. Current research demonstrates progress in disease-corrective mRNA expression, silencing of inflammatory and fibrotic pathways, mucosal vaccination, antiviral therapy, and localized cancer treatment, alongside advances in ionizable lipid nanoparticles, lipid-polymer hybrids, chitosan and polyethyleneimine (PEI) polyplexes, dendrimers, peptide carriers, biomimetic systems, and dry-powder formulations. Translational maturity, however, remains uneven. Many studies demonstrate carrier feasibility, reporter expression, or preclinical activity, whereas fewer establish device-compatible aerosolization, preservation of RNA integrity during processing, traversal of pulmonary barriers, target-cell engagement, repeat-dose tolerability, and clinically meaningful benefit. Development should therefore be target-defined, analytically gated, device-specific, and outcome-centered. Inhalable RNA nanomedicines are best understood as integrated pulmonary products whose success depends on preserving RNA function throughout manufacturing, aerosolization, post-deposition barrier navigation, intracellular delivery, and disease-relevant pharmacodynamic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.