ReviewPharmaceutics2026
HME-FDM 3D-Printed Implantable Drug Delivery Systems-From Design to Characterization.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable devices have undergone enormous development in the past several decades and more results are expected as there are still unanswered questions. In manufacturing, a relatively new technology called three-dimensional (3D) printing has become increasingly involved, from which hot-melt extrusion (HME) coupled with fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the most researched methods in producing implantable drug delivery systems (IDDS). The HME process is used to produce polymer filaments that are the carriers of the applied drugs, while FDM creates the implant itself from the filaments, based on the computer-aided designs. The availability of several polymers like polycaprolactone, polylactic acid, or thermoplastic polyurethane, etc., allows the incorporation of many active pharmaceutical ingredients while digital designs offer numerous variabilities in designs, formulations, and applications of 3D-printed IDDS. This allows more specific and detailed modifications in the end product which can forecast the possibility of personalized treatments and therapies. In this review, our research group gathered together different HME-FDM-printed IDDS to provide examples about the diverse applicability of 3D printing. These products, just like any other device and medicine in the medical field, must be characterized and evaluated properly. The methods and technology that are needed already exist and can be repeatedly used in the characterization of IDDSs; we also discuss these methods based on the available publications. In conclusion, every condition is given to make research and manufacture personalized 3D-printed IDDSs possible, however more research work and proof of safe usage are crucial to make these devices applicable in everyday medical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.