ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Mechanistic Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Drug Therapy: Integrating Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Multiomic Systems Biology.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interindividual variability in drug response remains a major challenge in clinical pharmacology despite substantial advances in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Although these approaches have improved individualized therapy, clinically important variability in efficacy and toxicity persists because drug response is determined not only by systemic exposure but also by target engagement, disease biology, compensatory pathways, organ function, immune status, and dynamic patient-specific molecular states. Recent advances in multiomics, systems pharmacology, and artificial intelligence (AI) provide an opportunity to integrate these complementary biological and clinical dimensions within more comprehensive precision pharmacotherapy frameworks. This narrative review examines the evolving integration of PK, PD, TDM, pharmacometrics, multiomic technologies, mechanistic AI, and systems pharmacology across drug development and clinical care. Particular emphasis is placed on the limitations of exposure-based dosing alone, the biological determinants of interindividual variability, the transition from conventional TDM toward adaptive model-informed monitoring, and emerging approaches for integrating molecular and clinical data to support individualized therapeutic decision-making. Operon™ is discussed as an illustrative example of an internally operated mechanistic systems biology platform to demonstrate how biologically informed computational frameworks may integrate pharmacological and multiomic information within drug development workflows. The review further examines applications in polypharmacy, drug-drug interaction assessment, clinical trial enrichment, regulatory science, and adaptive dosing, while emphasizing that analytical validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, prospective validation, transparency, and clearly defined contexts of use remain essential prerequisites for clinical implementation. Collectively, these developments support a transition from concentration-guided dosing toward mechanism-informed precision pharmacotherapy that integrates drug exposure with biological response and clinical outcomes while maintaining rigorous standards for validation and regulatory acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.