ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Functionally Graded Materials by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing: Material-Pair Compatibility and Spatial Mechanical Characterisation-A Systematic Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functionally Graded Materials (FGMs) vary in composition and properties for tailored structural performance. Additive Manufacturing (AM), particularly Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM), offers a scalable route to metallic FGMs, but manufacture and mechanical qualification remain disconnected. Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for eligible publications up to and including 31 July 2026. The review includes 176 studies, and every conclusion is graded by a review-specific certainty scheme and bounded to this corpus. The review connects FGM manufacture with full-field inverse identification of spatially varying properties. Evidence indicates interface-defect risk depends on metallurgical compatibility and the composition path. Intermetallic-forming or thermally mismatched pairs remain vulnerable despite process optimisation. Stainless-steel-Ni-superalloy combinations are more frequently reported as sound but only within the composition intervals validated in the cited builds: this apparent advantage reflects unequal study numbers and cracking in specific composition windows. A four-stage sequence-screening phase stability and thermal-expansion mismatch before optimising deposition parameters, then validating the complete composition path-is proposed as an evidence-informed framework rather than a validated decision map. Conventional tests generally provide averaged or location-specific properties rather than a continuous constitutive gradient. Digital image correlation coupled with inverse identification methods can enable the determination of spatially varying properties from a heterogeneous test. However, no experimental study identified a spatial constitutive law across a deliberate WAAM compositional gradient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.