ReviewPolymers2026
Photo-Responsive In Situ Forming Hydrogels for Drug Delivery: A Critical Review of Polymer Matrices, Photoinitiators, and the Gap Towards Clinical Translation.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local drug delivery increasingly relies on injectable hydrogels that form directly at the x'administration site, among which light-cured systems are of particular interest: irradiation converts a liquid precursor into a depot and can trigger drug release with high spatiotemporal resolution. The aim of this critical narrative review is to systematize the key design elements of such systems and to assess their path toward the clinic. We analyze the mechanisms of photoactivation, the role of wavelength, the natural, synthetic, and hybrid polymer matrices together with their tuning parameters, and the photoinitiators. The clinical and preclinical experience in dentistry, ophthalmology, regenerative medicine, and oncology is then considered separately. Finally, we address standardization through the Quality by Design concept. We show that, despite an extensive preclinical base, no photocrosslinkable injectable depot for drug delivery has yet been approved, whereas photopolymerization itself and the photoinitiators employed are already accepted in the clinic in adjacent fields. We conclude that clinical translation is defined by three tractable tasks: qualifying photoinitiators for the injectable route of administration, overcoming the limited depth of light activation, and standardizing characterization on the basis of Quality by Design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.