ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Feature Selection Analysis and Robustness to Missing Data for Sensor-Based Prognostic Modeling of Alzheimer's Disease Progression.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feature selection (FS) plays a critical role in sensor-based predictive modeling for Alzheimer's disease (AD), where heterogeneous clinical and neuroimaging measurements generate high-dimensional data with varying degrees of missingness due to incomplete clinical assessment of patients. Effective dimensionality reduction is essential to improve model interpretability, robustness, and generalization performance in sensor-driven healthcare applications. However, a systematic analysis of the interplay between FS strategies, missing-data handling, and prognostic modeling in sensor-derived AD data remains underexplored. In this study, we present a comprehensive and methodologically rigorous evaluation framework for AD prediction using multimodal data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. We jointly investigate multiple FS techniques and prognostic models on imputed datasets, systematically varying the number of top-ranked features. To ensure robustness, a K-fold cross-validation (CV) procedure is adopted and only features consistently selected across folds (intersection-based stability criterion) are retained. These stable feature subsets are subsequently evaluated on a test set. To further assess robustness to incomplete sensor measurements, we conduct a sensitivity analysis by varying the tolerated missingness thresholds for feature inclusion, reflecting realistic scenarios of incomplete clinical data availability. In this phase, XGBoost is employed both as a prognostic model and as an embedded FS method, exploiting its native capability to handle missing values and to provide feature-importance rankings based on predictive contribution. The proposed framework enables a systematic assessment of FS stability, predictive performance, and resilience to missing sensor data. Results provide practical methodological guidelines for the development of reliable and generalizable sensor-driven prognostic models for AD in real-world clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.