ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design, Modeling and Performance Analysis of an Actively Variable Stiffness Pneumatic Flexible Bending Joint.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contradiction between high compliance and low load-bearing capacity of flexible manipulators limits their engineering applications. Meanwhile, the theoretical modeling of the deformation and variable stiffness characteristics of flexible joints still faces considerable challenges. This paper proposes a positive-pressure double-airbag gap-constrained particle-jamming variable stiffness method and develops a novel actively variable stiffness pneumatic flexible bending joint with an integrated configuration of actuator, variable stiffness device (VSD), and primary structure. Based on classical elasticity theory and Coulomb-Amontons' law of friction, theoretical models for the bending angle and tangential stiffness are established and verified through prototype experiments. With VSD activation, the joint reaches a bending angle of 56.35° at 0.4 MPa. At 40° forward bending, VSD activation increases the tangential stiffness from 0.167 N/mm to 0.832 N/mm, with the stiffness ratio between 40° and 0° increasing from 1.56 without VSD to 4.80 with VSD activation. Model predictions agree well with experimental data, yielding mean relative errors of 6.77% for the bending-angle model with VSD and 6.76% for the forward tangential-stiffness model with VSD activation. A coupling effect between bending deformation and stiffness is observed. The results demonstrate that the proposed joint achieves substantial stiffness regulation, providing a basis for its application in flexible robotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.