Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656243›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2026

The role of receptive arts and culture to improve anxiety, depression and psychological distress in young people: a realist review.

Daniel Hayes, Joely Wright, Louise Chandler, Kayleigh Albaya de Gago, Summi Ng, Joe Langley, Daisy Fancourt, Kamaldeep Bhui, Roisin Mooney, Rebecca Syed Sheriff

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel HayesSocial Biobehavioural Research Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joely WrightSocial Biobehavioural Research Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Louise ChandlerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kayleigh Albaya de GagoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Summi NgDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joe LangleyLab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Daisy FancourtSocial Biobehavioural Research Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kamaldeep BhuiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Roisin MooneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Syed SheriffDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Arts and culture are increasingly recognised as potential supports for mental health, yet little distinction has been made between receptive engagement (e.g., visiting museums, watching performances, listening to music) and active participation (e.g., creating art or attending classes). There is limited understanding of how, for whom, and under what circumstances receptive engagement may influence anxiety, depression, and psychological distress in young people. Method: We conducted a realist review of evidence up to February 2026 to examine how receptive arts and cultural engagement may affect mental health in young people aged 16-24 years. An initial programme theory, developed through the Online Active Community Engagement programme, stakeholder consultation, and peer research, informed the search and guided analysis. We searched five academic databases and relevant grey literature. Eligible documents were screened against predefined criteria. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) were developed iteratively with peer researchers and the research team to refine the programme theory. Results: Eleven documents were included. Evidence supported CMOCs indicating that receptive engagement may support mental health through: (i) short-term affective relief via attentional shift and escapism; (ii) reflection and perspective-taking through exposure to diverse viewpoints; (iii) increased belonging through perceived human connection; (iv) identity safety through representation and inclusive content; and (v) support for emotion regulation when engagement is regular and accessible. Effects were most consistent for proximal outcomes during or shortly after engagement, with limited evidence for sustained reductions in anxiety, depression, or psychological distress beyond the engagement period. Conclusions: Receptive arts engagement may provide an acceptable, low-stigma form of support that complements, rather than replaces, clinical care. Benefits may occur across the continuum of need and contribute to prevention, particularly when engagement is relevant, inclusive, and sustained. Evidence for longer-term symptom reduction remains limited and warrants further investigation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023476421, PROSPERO 275 (CRD42023476421).

Indexed as

artsculturemental healthrealist reviewreceptiveyoung people

Identifiers

PMID42656243
PMCPMC13506279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.