Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656261›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026

Immunotherapy in urological cancers: new paradigms and a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world evidence.

Nabil Ismaili, Sanaa El Majjaoui

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nabil IsmailiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI Faculty of Medicine, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), Mohammed VI Foundation of Sciences and Health (FM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.
Sanaa El MajjaouiOncopathology, Biology and Environment of Cancer Laboratory, Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation (CM6RI), Mohammed VI Foundation of Sciences and Health (FM6SS), Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The therapeutic landscape of urological cancers has undergone a paradigm shift with the advent of immunotherapy. This systematic review synthesizes clinical trials that have established new standards of care, complemented by evidence on immunotherapy-radiotherapy combinations and real-world data. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (2010-2026) identified phase II/III trials evaluating ICIs, ADCs, vaccines, or cellular therapies, as well as immunoradiotehrapy, observational studies, and registries reporting real-world outcomes. Results: Fifty-three clinical trials met the inclusion criteria: bladder cancer (n=14), kidney cancer (n=21), and prostate cancer (n=18), complemented by immunoradiotherapy trials (n=20), and real-world evidence (n=19). In bladder cancer, perioperative durvalumab and Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab improved outcomes in MIBC, and the EV+pembrolizumab combination became a frontline standard for metastatic disease. Disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab improved outcomes in HER2-expressing tumours, and ctDNA-guided adjuvant atezolizumab introduces precision therapy for molecular residual disease. Emerging immunoradiotherapy combinations showed promising bladder-sparing potential (CR rates 64-88%). In kidney cancer, dual ICI and ICI+TKI combinations demonstrated long-term survival benefits. The RAMPART trial introduced adjuvant durvalumab ± tremelimumab, while transcriptomic-guided therapy and treatment of rare translocation RCC emerged from 2025-2026 trials. In prostate cancer, sipuleucel-T remains the first approved cancer vaccine, while newer trials explored ICIs (durvalumab+tremelimumab) and personalized peptide vaccines. Biomarker-driven approaches emerged across all tumor types, including ctDNA-guided therapy in bladder cancer, KIM 1 in kidney cancer, and PD-L1/DDR status in prostate cancer. Immunoradiotherapy combinations demonstrated activity in mCRPC (CA184-043, 5-year OS 7.9% vs 2.7%) and oligometastatic RCC (RAPPORT, ORR 63%). Real-world evidence confirmed trial findings while revealing critical gaps in access, the prognostic dominance of performance status, and the potential for radiotherapy-immunotherapy synergy. Conclusion: Immunotherapy has become a cornerstone of urological oncology. Current paradigms include early ICI/ADC intensification in bladder cancer, ICI-based combinations in renal cell carcinoma, and the gradual integration of vaccines and checkpoint inhibitors in prostate cancer. Real-world evidence and immunoradiotherapy represents an emerging frontier, though optimal fractionation and sequencing require further investigation. Despite major advances, challenges remain in overcoming resistance, optimizing sequencing, and ensuring equitable access.

Indexed as

antibody-drug conjugatesbladder cancercancer vaccinesimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapykidney cancerprostate cancerradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42656261
PMCPMC13506281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.