ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as the treatment of choice for early gastrointestinal cancers due to its minimally invasive nature, short recovery period, and brief hospitalization. However, postprocedural bleeding remains a frequent complication that may adversely affect clinical outcomes, particularly in elderly patients. Accurate prediction of bleeding risk after ESD is therefore essential to guide timely preventive interventions, mitigate complication rates, and ultimately enhance patient prognosis. Objective: To develop and interpret a machine learning model based on endoscopic features for predicting post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer, using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to provide explainable insights. This model is intended to support clinicians in early risk stratification and to facilitate individualized perioperative management aimed at improving outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 236 elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer who were treated at the Department of Gastroenterology and Emergency of Lu'an Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University between January 2022 and June 2025. Clinical data were systematically collected. Using stratified random sampling, patients were allocated to training and testing datasets in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was carried out via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Nine machine learning models were developed, and the model demonstrating the highest performance underwent SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to enhance interpretability. Results: Among the 236 patients included in the analysis, 35 met the criteria for delayed post-ESD bleeding, resulting in an incidence of 14.8%. The remaining 201 patients did not experience delayed bleeding. LASSO regression identified seven variables associated with bleeding risk: large submucosal vessels, submucosal fibrosis, lesion diameter, lesion depth, procedure duration, use of anticoagulant medication, and hemoglobin level. Using these features, we constructed nine machine-learning models: K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, approximate nearest neighbors, decision tree, light gradient boosting machine, random forest, extra trees, and gradient boosting machine. On the test set, the extra trees model performed best, with a sensitivity of 0.182, specificity of 0.983, F1-score of 0.286, and an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.879. SHAP analysis indicated that the features contributing most to the model's predictions were, in descending order: large submucosal vessels, lesion diameter, anticoagulant use, submucosal fibrosis, lesion depth, procedure duration, and hemoglobin level. Conclusion: We developed an interpretable Extra Trees model that effectively predicts the risk of post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer. This tool may aid clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients, thereby supporting targeted perioperative management and potentially improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.