SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Acupuncture-based interventions for blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk-related outcomes in adults with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood pressure control remains difficult in many adults with hypertension, and safe non-pharmacological strategies that can support conventional care are clinically relevant. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated acupuncture-based interventions for blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk-related outcomes in adults with hypertension. Randomized studies were identified from major biomedical databases and trial registers from inception to 16 March 2026. The primary synthesis focused on penetrating acupuncture and electroacupuncture, while non-penetrating acupoint stimulation was examined in extended analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Sixteen study reports representing 15 independent randomized studies were included. For end-of-treatment office blood pressure, acupuncture-based interventions reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -6.63 mmHg, 95% CI: -11.41 to -1.84) but showed no clear effect on diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.07 mmHg, 95% CI: -9.54 to 9.39). Change-score analyses showed a significant reduction in office diastolic blood pressure (MD -3.97 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.26 to -0.68), while systolic change crossed the null. Ambulatory blood pressure evidence was sparse; 24-h ambulatory diastolic change favored acupuncture-based interventions. No confirmed acupuncture- or stimulation-related serious adverse event was clearly reported. Overall, acupuncture-based interventions may support blood pressure control, especially systolic office blood pressure and diastolic change outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.