ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Potential synergistic effects of exercise and gut microbiota on post-stroke recovery: mechanistic insights and a proposed stage-specific research framework.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-stroke motor dysfunction imposes a profound burden on long-term quality of life. While conventional rehabilitation facilitates neuroplasticity, the marked interindividual variability in functional outcomes underscores the critical necessity for novel, synergistic adjuncts. Emerging evidence suggests that microbiota-related pathways may influence rehabilitation responsiveness; however, whether deliberate microbiota modification improves motor recovery remains uncertain. This narrative review summarizes evidence suggesting associations between post-stroke gut dysbiosis and motor outcomes, and integrates reported mechanistic pathways across barrier, immune, and metabolic domains to inform a phase-stratified exercise-microbiota framework for future trials. Stroke induces systemic disturbances that affect the intestinal barrier, immune regulation, and metabolic homeostasis. These perturbations are frequently accompanied by reduced abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa and altered neurotrophic signaling, changes that may constrain the neuroplastic milieu. Concurrently, structured exercise interventions have been demonstrated to remodel the gut ecosystem and modulate the systemic inflammatory milieu. In this context, microbiome-derived metabolites may function as signaling mediators that facilitate crosstalk among barrier integrity, immune regulation, and neural plasticity networks. Synthesizing these mechanistic insights, we propose a comprehensive framework that prioritizes the preservation of intestinal barrier integrity alongside titrated mobilization during the acute phase. Overall, combined interventions targeting exercise and the gut microbiota are biologically plausible and potentially feasible in stroke rehabilitation. While current evidence is promising, it remains nascent. Rigorous, phase-specific randomized controlled trials are imperative to confirm efficacy, define optimal dosing, and enable precision implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.