Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656777›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Assessment of emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies in China.

Minghua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Minghua ZhouDepartment of Administration Office, Luzhou People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies in China and provide a basis for decision-making aimed at enhancing these capabilities. Methods: Based on data from 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China from 2019 to 2023, explanatory factor analysis was used to identify the main factors of the 16 evaluation indicators reflecting emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies, calculate the factor scores for each year, and rank them. Results: Four main factors were extracted from the 16 evaluation indicators, and the cumulative variance explained after rotation was 85.172%, indicating a satisfactory extraction results. The factor scoring model is F = 0.397 × F Conclusion: Emergency management capacity in China is primarily influenced by the multi-stakeholder coordination factor, socioeconomic operation factor and healthcare security factor. The development of emergency management capacity varies across different regions in China. Regions such as Shandong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Henan have relatively strong emergency management capabilities, while regions such as Ningxia, Qinghai, and Tibet have relatively weak emergency management capabilities.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningEmergenciesPublic HealthChinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPublic Health InfrastructureChinaemergency management capacityexplanatory factor analysispublic health emergenciesregional disparities

Identifiers

PMID42656777
PMCPMC13506910

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.