ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Computer vision-based support system for B-line detection in lung ultrasound.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context and objectives: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe and cost-effective diagnostic tool. B-lines are fundamental ultrasound (US) artifacts for LUS-based diagnosis of various pulmonary conditions, especially for the evaluation of the lung parenchyma. However, the challenges in their identification and interpretation, combined with a shortage of experts and training programs, restrict the use of this tool in routine clinical practice. Methods: To overcome these limitations, this study presents a computer vision (CV)-based system for automatic B-line detection. The proposed system integrates preprocessing and feature engineering stages with an object detection module. First, LUS images are normalized to ensure interoperability across different US devices and settings. Subsequently, the Radon and inverse Radon transforms are applied to generate a mask that highlights hyperechoic vertical structures, which is then fused with the preprocessed LUS image. Finally, the resulting image serves as input for a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the You Only Look Once (YOLO) architecture, enabling the automatic localization of B-lines. Results: The results obtained on the test set demonstrate satisfactory performance, achieving a precision of 89.13%, a recall of 80.39%, and an average precision (AP) of 0.82 at an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.5. Conclusions: A clinical decision support tool is proposed, aimed at improving efficiency and consistency in LUS interpretation, as well as facilitating its integration into clinical practice. Although the system is still in its conceptual stage, these findings lay the groundwork for future clinical validation processes directed toward its future implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.