ReviewiMeta2026
Multi-omics-driven precision medicine.
Review in iMeta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics-driven precision medicine.iMeta · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine is increasingly constrained not by a lack of molecular data but by the absence of frameworks that can translate multidimensional biological information into actionable clinical decisions. Multi-omics-driven precision medicine (MODPM) addresses this lack by integrating genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiome, and clinical context into a multiscale framework that links molecular mechanisms, tissue organization, and patient trajectories. In this review, we propose a conceptual framework for MODPM and examine how advances in multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and foundation models are reshaping disease modeling, drug development, and precision intervention. We summarize the biological contributions of major omics layers and discuss how AI supports cross-modal representation learning, contextual modeling, and perturbation-aware prediction. We highlight drug development as a key translational application of MODPM and further discuss its clinical relevance across three major disease contexts: cancer, autoimmune diseases, and metabolic disorders, including cardiometabolic and renal-metabolic diseases. These examples illustrate how MODPM can support target discovery, disease endotyping, treatment response prediction, and clinical monitoring by analyzing shared mechanisms such as immune dysregulation, metabolic remodeling, chronic inflammation, tissue microenvironmental changes, and gene-environment interactions. Across these settings, MODPM enables finer molecular stratification, the identification of pathway-dominant disease states, improved response prediction, and dynamic treatment monitoring. We also discuss key barriers to implementation, including data heterogeneity, limited cohort diversity, polygenic complexity, workflow constraints, cost, and ethical issues related to privacy, consent, and data ownership. Overall, the value of MODPM lies not in stacking additional data layers but in building a multiscale, continuously learnable framework to link biological heterogeneity to clinically interpretable and actionable decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.