Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657076›Full record

ReviewThe MAK collection for occupational health and safety2026

Benzidine and its salts: MAK Value Documentation - Translation of the German version from 2024.

Andrea Hartwig, MAK Commission

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The MAK collection for occupational health and safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea HartwigInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Adenauerring 20a, Building 50.41 76131 Karlsruhe Germany.
MAK Commission

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production and technical use of benzidine [92-87-5] and its salts are prohibited by law in the EU and many other countries. Although benzidine was added to the List of MAK and BAT Values in 1966 and classified in Carcinogen Category 1 in 1975, documentation for the substance had not yet been compiled. To remedy this, the German Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission) has now prepared the documentation and additionally evaluated the end points germ cell mutagenicity, sensitization and skin absorption. Relevant studies and reviews were identified from a literature search. The carcinogenicity of benzidine has not been re-evaluated in detail because there is unequivocal evidence of its carcinogenic potential in humans: Numerous case reports and epidemiological studies from different countries show a strong and consistent association between benzidine exposure and the risk of bladder cancer. Many studies found benzidine to be genotoxic in vitro and in vivo. No studies with germ cells are available. Findings that benzidine dihydrochloride crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice after oral administration suggest that the substance may also be able to pass through the blood-testis barrier. Therefore, benzidine and its salts have been classified in Category 3 A for germ cell mutagens. Benzidine is readily absorbed by rats after dermal application in acetone. The substance is a genotoxic carcinogen and a systemically tolerable dose cannot be derived. Therefore, the designation with "H" (for substances which can be absorbed in toxicologically relevant amounts) has been retained. No studies that investigated benzidine salts are available. Although the salts are probably absorbed less readily, absorption cannot be ruled out and the salts of benzidine also remain designated with "H". There are no studies that investigated the sensitizing effects of benzidine in animals. Studies using alternative test methods are also not available. A limited number of clinical findings show positive reactions to benzidine. As patients with sensitization to aromatic para-amino compounds, such as p-phenylenediamine, often react to other compounds of this substance class as well, cross-reactivity to benzidine is possible. The data available are too limited to draw a conclusion regarding the skin sensitizing potential of benzidine and its salts. Data for respiratory sensitization are not available.

Indexed as

benzidine and its saltsbladder cancercarcinogenicitygerm cell mutagenicityhuman carcinogenmechanism of actionskin absorption

Identifiers

PMID42657076
PMCPMC13510892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.