ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026
Broadening the Agent Preference Hypothesis Through Experiencers: Eye-Tracking and EEG Evidence of Proto-Agents and Proto-Patients.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the large number of proposed event roles, psycholinguistic evidence supports only two core knowledge categories with distinct processing correlates: agent and patient roles. This evidence aligns with the proto-role approach, which proposes only two proto-roles, proto-agent and proto-patient. Here, we investigate the processing correlates of arguments labeled as "experiencers" to determine whether they exhibit specific processing correlates, as agents and patients do, or whether they are subsumed under the proto-agent role category, sharing similar processing correlates with agents and differing from patients. We conducted both eye-tracking and EEG reading tasks, where Spanish speakers were instructed to read intransitive sentences with either agent, experiencer, or patient subjects. In eye-tracking, agents and experiencers elicited longer fixation times and regression counts than patients, in both the verb and post-verb regions. In EEG, we replicated the known N400 component associated with processing patients compared to both agents and experiencers. Crucially, no N400 effect was observed when comparing agents to experiencers. Additionally, patients revealed a power increase in the theta band compared to agents and experiencers, and a power decrease in the low-beta band. These findings replicate previous results supporting a transient preference for agents in language comprehension and suggest that experiencers align with agents in this regard, providing further evidence for the proto-role approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.