ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Finetuning Foundation Models for Temporal Clinical Transcriptomics Data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimeseries clinical transcriptomic datasets offer the opportunity to gain insights into the dynamics of disease mechanisms/treatment responses. However, their utility in uncovering temporal patterns is often limited by high noise levels and small sample sizes. Leveraging foundational gene embeddings and incorporating interaction information can help address these challenges, improve gene network analysis, and enable the detection of subtle changes that drive disease progression or drug response.
resultsWe finetuned gene embeddings from foundation models using healthy tissue gene expression data and used them in temporal GNNs to model gene expression of responder and non-responders to treatment in four disease datasets-ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, Alopecia Areata, and psoriasis. Application of our method to these datasets confirmed known mechanisms associated with drug action, and also identified key differences between activated and repressed pathways for responders and non-responders, including B-Cell activation and mitochondria-related activity in ulcerative colitis patients.
conclusionFinetuning gene embeddings from foundation models provides a richer context to model gene expression data compared to using them in their naive state. Even with smaller sample sizes, results from GNN-based temporal models outperform traditional methods by detecting known mechanisms of response and unraveling role of genes and mechanisms not known to be associated with response and non-response. CODE AVAILABILITY: Code and data are available in a public GitHub repository-https://github.com/Sanofi-Public/GNN-Timeseries. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20494035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.