Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658313›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026

Long-term CPAP adherence in elderly patients after ambulatory initiation.

Louis Manon, Charlène Collard, Benoit Bihin, Gisèle Maury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis ManonSleep Lab Unit, Pulmonology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium. louis-manon@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8313-775X
Charlène CollardSleep Lab Unit, Pulmonology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6081-8857
Benoit BihinBiostatistics Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-6319
Gisèle MaurySleep Lab Unit, Pulmonology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4402-7670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), yet long-term adherence, especially in elderly populations remains underexplored. This study evaluated CPAP adherence at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years in patients aged ≥ 65 years with severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 30/h) managed via ambulatory auto-CPAP initiation.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective monocentric study at CHU UCL Namur Godinne. 45 patients aged ≥ 65 years were included between January 2020 and December 2021. Good CPAP adherence was set at ≥ 4 h/day (h/d) of usage. Clinical and technical variables, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and subjective improvement, were analyzed for their association with adherence.

results45 patients (31 males), aged (median and IQR) 69.0 (66.0-72.0) years old, BMI: 31 (28-35) kg/m

conclusionsIn our elderly population with severe OSA, there was a drop of adherent patients (≥4 h/d) at two years but among patients who used the CPAP, a good mean CPAP use in h/d was achieved at two years. A good adherence at the first visit at 3 months, 1 year, a low baseline ESS and subjective benefits appear to influence long-term adherence more than initial age.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareContinuous Positive Airway PressurePatient ComplianceSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAgedFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAuto-CPAPCPAP adherenceElderlyEpworth sleepiness scaleLong-term follow-upObstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.