ArticlePloS one2026
Co-producing access to care with young people living in Zambia through digital and vending machine-enabled innovation in sexual and reproductive health: A place-based, human-centred design research approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health innovation can fail to move beyond prototype or pilot stages or achieve intended outcomes due to a lack of involvement and attunement to local context. This article shares the potential of place-based co-production to support the development, acceptability and usability of context-attuned, digital health service innovation for young people. To illustrate the approach, we report on a collaborative, interdisciplinary project involving a Zambian public health research partner based in Lusaka, Zambia, three European universities and a not-for-profit digital innovation partner. Our youth-led, co-production process involved 6 stages: recruitment of youth Co-design Leaders; role play-based care pathway co-design; app co-design; digital prototype development; stakeholder consultation; and digital pathway testing. We used a combination of qualitative social science research, community and arts-based, human-centred design and digital innovation methods. Young people traced the digital testing and sampling process from accessing self-testing and sampling kits to laboratory processing of results through to how results should be communicated. They were encouraged to evaluate how these processes would work in the context of their everyday lives. We systematically embedded this ideation work into a technically functional 'eHealth Yabwela' app and clinical or laboratory worker-facing web application which young people user tested. Our place-based focus encouraged elicitation of whole pathway, in situ, logistical feasibility alongside social and technical concerns, enabling us to engage with potential adoption and accessibility barriers during the design process. Youth-led co-production created the conditions for participants to lead discussions, voice requirements and hold the project team accountable. Young people recognised that advocacy, overcoming digital inequalities, and further co-production with healthcare workers already facilitating youth-friendly healthcare provision would be needed to integrate the pathway within local systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.