Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42660944›Full record

ReviewNature communications2026

From polygenic risk to functional genomics: a framework for precision gynecological disease modeling.

Masuma Khatun, Juha S Tapanainen, Andres Salumets

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masuma KhatunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. masuma.khatun@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-2976-2319
Juha S TapanainenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Andres SalumetsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-1251-8160

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council) MOB3JD1246Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF24OC0092384Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2024-02530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological conditions including endometriosis, polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome and malignancies cause widespread chronic morbidity and infertility, yet translating genetic discoveries into biological mechanisms remains challenging. We propose a framework integrating biobank-derived human genetic data, patient-derived stem cell models, and advanced tissue engineering. By combining naturally occurring genetic variation with targeted genome engineering and high-resolution molecular analyses, this approach promises to enable mechanistic insights and therapeutic discovery. We discuss methodological, ethical, and translational challenges, including polygenic risk score construction, variant prioritization, ancestry-related limitations, and modeling hormonal microenvironments. Together, this framework offers a roadmap for advancing functional genomics and precision medicine across gynecological diseases.

Indexed as

Genital Diseases, FemaleGenomicsMultifactorial InheritancePrecision MedicineFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreHumans

Identifiers

PMID42660944
PMCPMC13522561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.