Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661201›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

"It has to be part of the clinic's lived culture"- perspectives of next of kin on meaningful participation in psychiatric care: a participatory thematic analysis.

Nora Dietrich, Johanna Leona Kummetat, Silvia Bahl, Sebastian Bayer, Kolja Heumann, Susanne Kappesser, Thomas Klatt, Sarah Schernau, Sven Speerforck, Sebastian von Peter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nora DietrichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany. nora.dietrich@mhb-fontane.de.
Johanna Leona KummetatDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Silvia BahlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian BayerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Kolja HeumannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Susanne KappesserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KlattDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Sarah SchernauDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Sven SpeerforckDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian von Peter *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Laura Galbusera *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe participation of next of kin in psychiatric care is widely recommended in clinical guidelines and research, as it has been associated with improved recovery outcomes and benefits for the wellbeing of next of kin themselves. However, many next of kin report limited opportunities for meaningful participation. Existing research has largely focused on barriers especially from the perspective of clinical professionals, while the perspectives of next of kin regarding what constitutes successful participation remain underexplored.

methodsThis participatory qualitative study was conducted as part of the "PazAng" research project in Germany. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 next of kin of persons in psychiatric treatment, followed by two focus groups with an additional 15 participants to deepen the findings (total N = 30). Data were analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Data collection, coding and theme development were conducted collaboratively by a multidisciplinary research team including researchers with and without lived experience as next of kin.

resultsThree main themes were analyzed. First, participants emphasized the importance of a "network-conscious clinical culture", in which next of kin are recognized as legitimate partners within the social network surrounding the person in treatment and proactively engaged by clinical staff. Second, participants described "different foci of participation", including interventions supporting the person in treatment, relationship-focused formats, and support specifically addressing the wellbeing of next of kin. Third, participants highlighted "changing needs over time", describing distinct phases such as an initial shock phase requiring orientation and support, a prolonged endurance phase, and critical transition periods such as discharge from inpatient care.

conclusionsFrom the perspective of next of kin, meaningful participation in psychiatric care requires a supportive clinical culture that recognizes relational networks and changing needs over time. The findings suggest that participation is experienced as more meaningful when next of kin are acknowledged as partners, offered different forms of support, and considered across different phases of care. These findings highlight the importance of culturally and structurally integrating next-of-kin participation in routine psychiatric care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportInformal caregiverNext of kin participationNext of kin perspectivesParticipatory researchReflexive thematic analysisSocial psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID42661201
PMCPMC13520185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.