ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2026
OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: A real-life multicenter study of 479 patients.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder that poses significant treatment challenges, particularly when complicated by medication-overuse headache (MOH). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) in a large cohort of Polish patients within national reimbursement program and to identify clinical predictors of treatment response. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter observational study of 479 patients (88.9% female, mean age 43.6±11.6 years) treated with BoNT-A (195 U, PREEMPT protocol) across 12 tertiary headache centers. All patients had failed at least two prior oral preventive therapies. Effectiveness was assessed after three treatment cycles (9 months). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with treatment response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD). Results: At baseline, the mean MHD was 19.1±4.4. After 9 months, the mean reduction in MHD was 5.9±5.4 days, and the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score improved by an average of 52.7±48.3 points. At the 9-month follow-up, 27.3% of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHD, and 23.2% were partial responders (25-49% reduction). Notably, 41.6% of patients with concomitant MOH at baseline no longer met the criteria for MOH after treatment. Multivariable analysis identified a positive family history of migraine (OR=0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.84; p=0.005) and ≥4 prior preventive medication failures (OR=0.61; 95% CI 0.37-0.98; p=0.04) as independent predictors of a poorer response. However, the model demonstrated low discriminative ability (AUC=0.605; cross-validated AUC=0.54). Conclusions: BoNT-A is an effective and safe treatment for CM in a real-world setting, significantly reducing headache burden and MOH rates. While high treatment resistance and genetic predisposition were statistically associated with a poorer response, the poor predictive ability of the clinical model suggests that standard clinical phenotypes alone are insufficient to predict BoNT-A outcomes. These findings highlight the challenges of managing highly refractory populations within strict programmatic frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.