ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Nasal Nitric Oxide as a Novel Biomarker for Assessing Risk of Impaired Neurodevelopment in Infants and Newborns with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is a non-invasive marker for predicting the risk of neurodevelopmental delays. We investigated whether nNO in infants with CHD undergoing congenital cardiac surgery could serve as a biomarker for assessing the risk of impaired neurodevelopment. Retrospective cohort study. Single center in a tertiary care children's hospital. A retrospective study was conducted on 63 CHD patients, 0-12 months old, who had cardiac bypass surgery in the 1st year of life and for whom nNO levels had been collected before surgery using the chemiluminescent CLDsp88 NO analyzer. Neurodevelopmental assessments in patients older than 1 year were retained for analysis. NO levels were dichotomized as normal or low based on previously established age-stratified norms. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to examine possible confounders. CHD patients with low nNO exhibited significant neurodevelopmental delays (P < 0.001), cognitive delays (P = 0.0021), language delays (P < 0.001), and a trend toward motor delays (P = 0.034). Multivariable regression analysis incorporating various confounders as covariates (stroke, cardiac arrest, arrhythmia, seizures, genetic anomalies) supports a significant association between low nNO and cognitive delay (P = 0.011), language delay (P = 0.001), and any delays (P = 0.001). Our findings show that low nNO in newborns with CHD is significantly associated with impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes. These findings suggest nNO may serve as a biomarker to identify newborns with CHD who are at increased risk for adverse neurodevelopment. This may create opportunities for early intervention targeting a common factor underlying both low NO and worse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663622What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.