ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and clinical outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from a large clinical cohort.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the recognized biological relevance of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in immune evasion, the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in surgically treated oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC) patients remains largely unclear.
objectiveTo investigate the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in a large cohort of OSCC patients primarily treated surgically in a single center.
methodsThis analysis included 156 consecutive OSCC patients treated with curative-intent surgery with their clinicopathologic variables, treatment details and clinical treatment outcomes. PD-L1 expression was categorized using the Combined Positive Score (CPS), defining PD-L1 positivity as CPS ≥ 10. Sensitivity analyses were repeated at the alternative thresholds CPS ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 20. Survival and recurrence endpoints (OS, DFS, LRCR, NCR) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier/log-rank methods and Cox regression with multivariable adjustment for key confounders.
resultsOf 156 consecutive OSCC patients, 120 (76.9%) were PD-L1-positive. PD-L1 status was not associated with any clinicopathological parameter investigated herein. At 3 years, OS (76.1% vs. 68.7%), DFS (63.5% vs. 42.6%), LRCR (77.1% vs. 75.5%), and NCR (93.0% vs. 91.0%) were comparable between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients, respectively. Neither binary PD-L1 classification nor continuous CPS was associated with OS, DFS, LRCR, or NCR in multivariable Cox regression, with no differential effect by disease stage. In adjuvant-treatment-stratified analysis, PD-L1 positivity was associated with improved DFS in patients without adjuvant therapy, but not in those who received it. In sensitivity analyses, findings at CPS ≥ 20 were concordant with the primary analysis, whereas at CPS ≥ 1 PD-L1 positivity was associated with superior OS (HR = 0.280 [95% CI: 0.106-0.745]; p = 0.011).
conclusionWithin a mean follow-up of 15.7 ± 12.5 months, PD-L1 expression assessed by CPS was not independently associated with survival or recurrence outcomes in surgically treated OSCC at the prespecified cutoff of CPS ≥ 10, nor at CPS ≥ 20. An isolated overall survival association at CPS ≥ 1 was driven by a very small PD-L1-negative reference group and should not be regarded as robust. Taken together, these data argue against a reliable standalone prognostic value of PD-L1 in the early postoperative period while the limited observation time does not permit conclusions on late recurrence or long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.