ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Development of a machine learning prediction model for overactive bladder in female nurses: the NURS study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and internally validate interpretable machine-learning models for identifying individuals with a higher probability of overactive bladder (OAB) among female nursing professionals.
methodsA total of 13,191 female nurses participating in the Nurse Urinary Related Health Study were included and divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) cohorts. Seven distinct machine learning algorithms were implemented and evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The best-performing model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify feature contributions. Recursive feature elimination based on SHAP importance scores was employed to develop a parsimonious model while maintaining optimal predictive performance.
resultsOAB was observed in 11.2% of female nurses. The logistic regression algorithm outperformed all other models, demonstrating the highest predictive performance (validation AUC 0.751; 95% CI 0.729-0.774). Through systematic feature reduction, a streamlined 10-feature model was identified as the final predictive tool. The most influential predictors, ranked by mean SHAP value were: urine holding behavior, straining to void, sleep disorder, delayed voiding, perceived stress, fluid limitation, body mass index (BMI), anxiety, constipation, and parity. A nomogram was constructed to support practical implementation of the model.
conclusionOur study developed a clinically applicable risk assessment tool for estimating OAB probability in female nurses, with conventional logistic regression outperforming more complex machine learning algorithms. The parsimonious model provides a practical screening tool that could be integrated into occupational health programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665723What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.