Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665807›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Personalization and Fortification of In-Space Manufactured Emulsified Beverages for Long-Term Space Travel.

Svenja Schmidt, Ian Fisk, Ni Yang, Maria Saarela, Volker Hessel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Svenja SchmidtSchool of Chemical Engineering, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-2021
Ian FiskARC Centre of Excellence in Plants for Space, Adelaide University, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-3123
Ni YangInternational Flavour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.
Maria SaarelaSouth Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Waite Campus, Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.
Volker HesselSchool of Chemical Engineering, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current trend of individualized food items (nutrient content and flavor) can be particularly valuable to support people's health and well-being in isolated environments where access to fresh foods and diverse nutrition is difficult. At the same time, bioactive compounds and micronutrients can be employed to countermeasure any health hazards characteristic for the respective environment. Outer space is well-known as a hazardous environment due to microgravity, space radiation, and extreme living situation, whereas food monotony has led to insufficient caloric intake in the past. We are proposing to adapt the current trends of fortification and personalization for a novel space food system to support astronaut's health and increase food choice. Beverages as food matrix allow straightforward adjustment of their composition, whereas beverage emulsions as formulation strategy allow encapsulation of hydrophobic ingredients. This literature review gives an overview of food and beverage fortification on Earth, current and in-development space food systems, common space health risks with the potential to be attenuated by nutrition/supplementation, as well as bioactive compounds potentially suitable for beverage fortification. Finally, a process concept is presented that could enable in-space manufacturing of beverages for future space travel.

Indexed as

BeveragesFood, FortifiedSpace FlightEmulsionsHumansNutritive ValueWeightlessnessEmulsions

Identifiers

PMID42665807
PMCPMC13525091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.