ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Psychological Readiness for Surgery Through Prehabilitation and Treatment: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychological prehabilitation aims to prepare patients for cancer treatment, yet psychological readiness is under-specified and distress during and after treatment is common. A patient-informed account of readiness is needed to guide readiness-focused, proactive psychological support in cancer care.
aimsTo examine patients' experiences of psychological readiness for cancer surgery across the prehabilitation-treatment pathway.
methodsWe used a longitudinal qualitative design. Ten adults enroled in a tertiary cancer prehabilitation service for major elective surgery completed semi-structured interviews before surgery (T1) and after surgery (T2). We analysed data using Reflexive Thematic Analysis with an inductive, semantic approach, and compared change and stability across time points using a longitudinal analytic matrix.
resultsParticipants described psychological readiness as developing a future-focused "mindset to have surgery", comprising three interrelated elements that were stable from T1 to T2: confidence, motivation, and contained anxiety, that is, anxiety that remained expected and manageable rather than absent or overwhelming. Three processes shaped this mindset. Reliable and complete information from professionals and credible peers supported clearer and more concrete expectations, increased confidence, and helped keep anxiety manageable. Participants preferred candid information about plausible difficulties over reassurance that downplayed them. Reciprocal support from family, peers, and professionals strengthened motivation and reduced loneliness. Readiness could be held back when participants found it difficult to tell loved ones about their diagnosis. Agency developed through drawing on personal resources and taking controllable steps, including making progress visible through prehabilitation activity and staff encouragement.
conclusionsThese findings identify provisional, patient-informed targets for psychological preparation within multimodal prehabilitation. They provide a foundation to operationalise and measure readiness and, following work on transferability, co-production and feasibility, to test whether readiness-focused support in prehabilitation is associated with post-operative adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.