SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Exercise interventions and multidimensional cognitive function in esports players: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Esports places stringent demands on participants in terms of neural information processing speed, real-time decision-making precision, and cognitive stability. The coexistence of prolonged sedentary training patterns and sustained high-intensity mental workload has rendered the maintenance of cognitive function in esports populations an urgent scientific concern. This study employs systematic review and meta-analysis methods to quantitatively synthesize the effects of exercise interventions on multidimensional cognitive function in esports players, with the aim of providing evidence-based references for the scientific training of esports athletes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from database inception to May 3, 2026, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated physical activity interventions among esports players. Two independent researchers completed literature screening and data extraction. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess risk of bias, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 5,298 records were identified through database searching, and 10 randomized controlled trials involving 503 participants were ultimately included. Regarding cognitive speed, exercise intervention significantly reduced players' reaction time (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.50-1.18), with subgroup analysis indicating that VR/exergame interventions yielded a numerically higher effect size (SMD = 1.01) compared to traditional aerobic exercise (SMD = 0.64). Regarding operational accuracy, the intervention effect was robust and highly consistent across conditions (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.76, I Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that exercise intervention is a potentially effective approach for improving multidimensional cognitive function in esports players, with positive effects observed across cognitive processing speed, operational precision, and executive function and memory. VR/exergame interventions showed a numerically larger effect size for cognitive processing speed compared with traditional exercise modalities; however, this difference should be interpreted cautiously due to the exploratory nature of subgroup analyses. Future esports training systems may consider incorporating structured exercise interventions into routine training programs, with the aim of maintaining players' cognitive health while exploring feasible pathways for extending career longevity. Systematic review registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier [CRD420261385557].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.