ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Implementation process of community-based lifestyle interventions supported by technology for elderly population: qualitative evaluation of six European regions case studies.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Community-based interventions represent a strategic approach to integrating the salutogenic model, involving multi-sectoral stakeholders to improve the health of specific communities. In the context of the EU's ageing population, eHealth technologies provide valuable solutions by improving older individuals' health and well-being through better access to knowledge, strengthening environmental relationships, and supporting the sustainability of health systems. This manuscript explores a community-based health promotion intervention focused on eHealth apps tested across six European regions within the GATEKEEPER project. Method: An observational studies were conducted in the European regions of Basque Country (Spain), Aragon (Spain), Saxony (Germany), Puglia (Italy), Lodz (Poland), and Central Greece and Attica (Greece). Qualitative techniques were used to evaluate the implementation process of the community-based interventions, focused on the analysis of the facilitators, barriers, and contextual factors influencing delivery and end-users engagement to the technologies tested. Results: Several factors influenced the success of the interventions, including the customisation and adaptation of applications to users' specific needs, the provision of incentives to promote engagement, and the support from health and community professionals. Customising apps to be user-friendly and culturally relevant ensures accessibility for diverse populations, while adaptation addresses varying levels of health literacy and digital skills. Continuous support from professionals fosters trust, reduces barriers to adoption, and promotes sustained engagement. Discussion: This study provides insights into factors influencing the implementation process and adherence to digital health interventions. Understanding adherence, intention to use, and dropout rates is essential for identifying the factors contributing to the limited impact of digitally-enabled real-world interventions. The findings stress the importance of co-designing interventions, ensuring user involvement from the beginning, which improves the alignment of technology with users' needs and increases engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.