ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026
Eligibility-Identification Difficulty and Self-Reported Preventive Care Implementation Among Japanese Primary Care Physicians.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary care is an important setting for prevention, but implementation gaps may arise before clinicians can identify patients eligible for preventive services. We described self-reported preventive care implementation among Japanese primary care physicians and examined whether lower implementation co-occurred with eligibility-identification difficulty. Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey of physician members of the Japan Primary Care Association from May to June 2025. Respondents reported recommendation consistency for 30 preventive services, difficulty identifying eligible patients, and perceived barriers. Service-level implementation and eligibility-identification difficulty were summarized in a two-axis map. Results: Among 258 respondents, 56.2% reported structured preventive care training and 53.9% used outpatient reminders. "Mostly achieved" recommendation was relatively high for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia screening and influenza vaccination, but low for screening for domestic violence, chlamydia/gonorrhea, abdominal aortic aneurysm, anxiety, and depression, respiratory syncytial virus vaccination, and folic acid counseling. Difficulty identifying eligible patients was highest for domestic violence screening (14.0%), chlamydia/gonorrhea screening (13.6%), hepatitis C screening (10.5%), and respiratory syncytial virus vaccination (7.8%). Common barriers were time constraints, insufficient knowledge or skills, low patient interest, and financial or reimbursement issues. Conclusions: Self-reported implementation varied substantially across services. Some low-implementation services also involved eligibility-identification difficulty, suggesting an upstream implementation problem. Japanese primary care may need systems that make eligibility visible through training, reminders, prompts, registries, and team-based workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.