Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666416›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026

Eligibility-Identification Difficulty and Self-Reported Preventive Care Implementation Among Japanese Primary Care Physicians.

Hironori Yamada, Kei Miyazaki, Makito Yaegashi, Kuniko Nakayama, Rei Suganaga, Nobuaki Kusaka, Wataru Hirohashi, Tomio Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hironori YamadaShinjuku Tsurukame Clinic Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-4367
Kei MiyazakiDepartment of General Medicine and General Internal Medicine Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-4519
Makito YaegashiShinjuku Tsurukame Clinic Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1380-406X
Kuniko NakayamaMy Family Clinic Gamagori Medical Corporation MEFA Jin-Aikai Gamagori Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4356-9666
Rei SuganagaKameda Family Clinic Tateyama Tateyama Chiba Japan.
Nobuaki KusakaDepartment of Postgraduate Education Center Kameda Medical Center Tateyama Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3643-0183
Wataru HirohashiOuchi Clinic Nishiarai, Medical Corporation Daiwakai Heisei Medical Welfare Group Tokyo Japan.
Tomio SuzukiDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Takatsuki Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary care is an important setting for prevention, but implementation gaps may arise before clinicians can identify patients eligible for preventive services. We described self-reported preventive care implementation among Japanese primary care physicians and examined whether lower implementation co-occurred with eligibility-identification difficulty. Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey of physician members of the Japan Primary Care Association from May to June 2025. Respondents reported recommendation consistency for 30 preventive services, difficulty identifying eligible patients, and perceived barriers. Service-level implementation and eligibility-identification difficulty were summarized in a two-axis map. Results: Among 258 respondents, 56.2% reported structured preventive care training and 53.9% used outpatient reminders. "Mostly achieved" recommendation was relatively high for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia screening and influenza vaccination, but low for screening for domestic violence, chlamydia/gonorrhea, abdominal aortic aneurysm, anxiety, and depression, respiratory syncytial virus vaccination, and folic acid counseling. Difficulty identifying eligible patients was highest for domestic violence screening (14.0%), chlamydia/gonorrhea screening (13.6%), hepatitis C screening (10.5%), and respiratory syncytial virus vaccination (7.8%). Common barriers were time constraints, insufficient knowledge or skills, low patient interest, and financial or reimbursement issues. Conclusions: Self-reported implementation varied substantially across services. Some low-implementation services also involved eligibility-identification difficulty, suggesting an upstream implementation problem. Japanese primary care may need systems that make eligibility visible through training, reminders, prompts, registries, and team-based workflows.

Indexed as

health promotionimmunizationpreventionprimary carescreening

Identifiers

PMID42666416
PMCPMC13522630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.