ReviewJournal of healthcare informatics research2026
A Systematic Review of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Longitudinal Multimodal Clinical Data.
Review in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in healthcare to support diagnosis and treatment by leveraging longitudinal multimodal data, despite persistent challenges such as missing data and heterogeneity. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, analyzed deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) applications to longitudinal multimodal clinical data published between 2020 and 2024. An initial search identified 1,124 records; a total of 54 items were included (53 studies meeting inclusion criteria and 1 dataset descriptor). Relevant research studies increased substantially over the review period, from 3 studies in 2020 to 21 in 2024. Prediction (n = 23) and classification (n = 19) were the most commonly addressed tasks. Structured electronic health records (EHRs) and medical imaging were the most frequently used data sources, reported in 48 and 33 studies, respectively, and were often used in combination. Regarding missing data, 34 studies reported general handling strategies, and 10 explicitly addressed missing modalities. While methodological variability and performance limitations remain, these findings highlight the growing use of DL and ML to analyze multimodal data, which may inform clinical decision support. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-026-00248-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.