ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Report from the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation - infantile glioma and other non-embryonal central nervous system tumors: evolving molecular advances and current treatment landscape.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain tumors in infants represent a rare but clinically challenging subset of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. These tumors are biologically and clinically distinct from those in older children and adults, with a predilection for supratentorial locations, frequent presentation with macrocephaly and signs of increased intracranial pressure, and unique molecular profiles. There have been many advances in molecular profiling, now influencing treatment choice and outcomes. Non-embryonal tumor types-including glial tumors, choroid plexus tumors, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, teratoma, and germ cell tumors-collectively constitute the majority of infant brain tumors and warrant focused attention. Methods and scope: This review synthesizes the current literature on the epidemiology, molecular biology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of non-embryonal brain tumors diagnosed in infants (age ≤12-36 months). Tumor types addressed include low-grade and high-grade gliomas (including the recently defined infant-type hemispheric glioma [IHG]), choroid plexus papilloma and carcinoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, teratoma, and intracranial germ cell tumors. Key findings: Glial tumors are among the most common infant brain tumors, with low-grade gliomas demonstrating excellent survival approaching 100%, while high-grade gliomas carry a significantly worse prognosis. IHGs are a molecularly distinct entity driven by receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusions involving ALK, NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, and MET, with three-year overall survival of approximately 80% and emerging evidence supporting targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Choroid plexus papillomas peak during infancy and are curable with gross total resection, whereas choroid plexus carcinomas have five-year survival rates of 61-65% and require multimodal therapy. Posterior fossa A (PFA) ependymomas predominate in infants and behave more aggressively than other ependymoma subtypes. Craniopharyngiomas, though rare in infancy, present unique surgical challenges given their proximity to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Intracranial teratomas are the most common congenital brain tumors. Conclusions: Non-embryonal infant brain tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with widely variable outcomes. Advances in molecular classification-particularly the identification of targetable RTK fusions in IHG-are reshaping therapeutic paradigms. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization per the WHO CNS5 classification is essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment planning in this vulnerable population. Collaborative, prospective studies are needed to establish standardized treatment approaches and improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.