ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Combined with Gabapentin for Head and Facial Pain in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Head and facial pain caused by local invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is notoriously severe and traditionally managed with opioids, which carry substantial dependence and tolerability risks. Because this tumor-related pain intrinsically involves both neuropathic and inflammatory pathways, we retrospectively evaluated a novel opioid-sparing analgesic strategy combining celecoxib and gabapentin. Methods: This exploratory retrospective cohort analysis included 60 newly diagnosed NPC patients experiencing severe head and facial pain secondary to cranial nerve or skull base invasion. Patients received either opioid monotherapy (extended-release oxycodone, n=30) or a combined regimen of celecoxib and gabapentin (n=30). The primary endpoint was the absolute reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 48 hours. Secondary endpoints included sleep quality improvement, assessed via the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and adverse events. Longitudinal data were rigorously analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to account for repeated measures and adjust for baseline clinical covariates. Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were broadly comparable between the cohorts, with no statistically significant differences in premedication NRS scores (6.5 in both groups) or ISI scores (16.5 vs 19.5, P = 0.118); however, the combined group had a numerically higher baseline ISI score, and all ISI comparisons were therefore based on change-from-baseline scores. The GEE longitudinal analysis revealed a significant treatment-by-time interaction for pain relief. At the 48-hour primary endpoint, the combined regimen demonstrated a significantly greater absolute reduction in NRS scores compared to the opioid group (Estimated Mean Difference [MD], 2.15; 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.85; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the combined therapy yielded a profoundly larger improvement in sleep architecture (ISI reduction MD, 9.85; 95% CI, 7.50 to 12.20; P < 0.001). Safety profiles analyzed via Fisher's exact test confirmed the combined group had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (0.0% vs 20.0%, P = 0.024); no significant between-group differences were observed for other adverse events including constipation, dizziness, and somnolence. Conclusion: Combining celecoxib and gabapentin appears to offer an effective, opioid-sparing alternative for managing complex tumor-related pain in NPC, and was associated with greater pain reduction over the 48-hour observation period, accelerated sleep recovery, and significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability compared to conventional opioid therapy in this retrospective cohort. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.