Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668293›Full record

Observational studyCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the opportunity to treat patients with breast cancer: experience at a reference cancer center in Mexico City.

Blanca Margarita Cruz-Badillo, Caleb García-Arango, Ixtayul Leopoldo Aldama-Santos, Laura Denisse Cuapantecatl-Hernandez, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Blanca Margarita Cruz-BadilloSubdirectorate of Quality Management, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico.
Caleb García-ArangoEpidemiology Research Unit, Research Directorate, National Cancer Institute (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico.
Ixtayul Leopoldo Aldama-SantosMedical Directorate, Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers. (Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura Denisse Cuapantecatl-HernandezEpidemiology Research Unit, Research Directorate, National Cancer Institute (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico.
Nancy Reynoso-NoverónEpidemiology Research Unit, Research Directorate, National Cancer Institute (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico. nrn231002@yahoo.com.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-2287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelays from diagnosis to first treatment are a persistent challenge in Mexico. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective observational cohort at the National Cancer Institute (INCAN), Mexico City (November 2017-December 2021). Women with first-time breast cancer and complete dates for diagnosis and treatment start were included. Primary outcome was diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) in days; timeliness was defined as initiation ≤ 30 days. Bivariate tests and multivariable logistic regression were used (two-sided α = .05).

resultsWe included 425 women. Median DTI was 18 days (IQR 14-24) among timely cases and 42 days (IQR 35-55) among delayed cases. By care period, median DTI was 28 days pre-pandemic and 23.5 days during the pandemic; the proportion initiating ≤ 30 days was similar (58.7 vs 61.9%; P = .509). In bivariate analysis (Supplementary Table S1), timeliness differed by initial treatment-chemotherapy and hormone therapy showed higher odds than surgery (global P< .001)-and high socioeconomic status had lower odds versus low status (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.96; P = .042); the care period was not significant (P = .509). In multivariable models, pandemic care was associated with lower odds of timeliness (aOR, 0.54; 95%  CI, 0.33-0.88; P = .014); starting with chemotherapy (aOR, 19.77; 95%  CI, 5.23-74.62; P <.001) or hormone therapy (aOR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.14-6.85; P = .024) increased the odds; each additional day from first consultation to referral to medical oncology reduced the odds (per-day OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P = .005).

conclusionA subset of patients experienced clinically relevant delays. Despite similar ≤ 30-day proportions across periods, pandemic care was independently linked to reduced timeliness after adjustment. Streamlined referral and process optimization are priorities to preserve timely access under system stress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In a tertiary center in Mexico City, the diagnosis-to-treatment interval was substantially shorter for patients initiating chemotherapy or hormone therapy than for those starting with surgery. Each additional day from first consultation to referral to medical oncology reduced the odds of meeting the ≤ 30-day target. Focusing on referral logistics and early treatment decision points can preserve timeliness under system stress and can be implemented without new infrastructure, informing pragmatic pathways in similar middle-income settings.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19Time-to-TreatmentAdultAgedCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMexicoMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment DelayBreast cancerMexicoOpportunity treatmentSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.