ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Psychometric properties and age- and gender-specific normative values of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 among older adults aged 60 years and above.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health problems in older adults are often underrecognized despite their substantial impact on health and well-being. Brief, valid screening tools with age-specific normative data are needed for this growing population. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and established age- and gender-specific normative values for adults aged 60 years and older in Germany.
methodsData were drawn from four nationally representative face-to-face household surveys conducted in Germany between 2021 and 2024. Four of the total 3,212 participants were excluded due to missing PHQ-4 responses, resulting in a final sample of N = 3,208. The psychometric properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2), the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) were evaluated.
resultsThe PHQ-4 showed excellent internal consistency. The correlated two-factor model, distinguishing depression and anxiety symptoms, demonstrated excellent fit. Measurement invariance was supported across gender and age groups. Women reported higher overall psychological distress than men, mainly due to higher anxiety symptoms, and PHQ-4 scores were highest in the oldest age group. Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong negative correlations with quality of life, resilience, sense of coherence, and well-being. Age- and gender-specific normative values were provided for the PHQ-2, GAD-2, and PHQ-4.
conclusionsThe PHQ-4 is a reliable and valid ultra-brief screening instrument for psychological distress. The age- and gender-specific normative values provided here may improve score interpretation for community-dwelling older adults in Germany and help identify individuals who may require further clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.