ArticleBMC oral health2026
Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate preoperative assessment of the spatial relationship between mandibular third molars (M3Ms) and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is essential to minimize the risk of nerve injury. While panoramic radiographs (PRs) are routinely used as a first-line modality, their two-dimensional nature limits diagnostic reliability, often necessitating confirmatory cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
methodsWe developed a dual-stream, transformer-enhanced multimodal (panoramic radiography + selected CBCT slices) deep learning framework designed as a clinician-in-the-loop system. The model jointly processes paired panoramic radiographs and operator-selected CBCT slices to simulate a realistic specialist consultation. Four widely used high-performance backbones (ConvNeXt, Swin Transformer, ResNet-50, and VGG16) were systematically evaluated on a dataset of 250 paired PR-CBCT cases. Model performance was assessed using F
resultsAmong the evaluated architectures, the ConvNeXt-based model achieved the highest overall performance, with a macro F
conclusionThe proposed multimodal 2D framework demonstrates competitive and robust classification performance. By integrating expert slice selection with automated feature extraction, the model functions as a standardized decision-support tool, aimed at reducing diagnostic variability in complex boundary cases where visual interpretation alone may be subjective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.