Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668612›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Diagnostic and prognostic role of circular RNAs: Analytical challenges and emerging opportunities.

Alessandra Glovi, Panagiota M Kalligosfyri, Antonella Miglione, Gabriella Iula, Sima Singh, Michelino De Laurentiis, Stefano Cinti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra GloviClinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Panagiota M KalligosfyriDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonella MiglioneDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gabriella IulaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Sima SinghDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Stefano CintiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are covalently closed non-coding RNAs characterized by high stability, tissue-specific expression, and important regulatory roles in gene expression and cellular pathways across cancer, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Their stability in biofluids and disease-associated expression patterns make them attractive candidates for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This review examines the analytical strategies used to detect and quantify circRNAs, including amplification-based methods (RT-qPCR, droplet digital PCR, and isothermal amplification), hybridization-based assays (Northern blot, FISH, and microarrays), sequencing approaches (short- and long-read RNA-seq), and emerging biosensor technologies. These methods are discussed in the context of their principles, strengths, limitations, and suitability for different research and clinical applications. By integrating current knowledge of circRNA biology with practical guidance on analytical workflows, this review provides a framework for selecting appropriate detection strategies and supports the development of reliable circRNA-based diagnostics and future precision medicine applications.

Indexed as

back-splice junctioncircRNAdiagnosisnucleic acid sensingprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42668612
PMCPMC13524706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.