Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668805›Full record

ReviewCaspian journal of internal medicine2026

Red meat consumption: A comprehensive overview of the mechanistic evidence for the effects of oncogenes.

Erfan Mosharkesh, Neda Roshanravan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erfan MosharkeshFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Neda RoshanravanCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have recently shown a very high correlation between consumption of red meat and meat products, the most important source of protein for humans, and cancer. The molecular basis of the red meat-cancer relationship is still poorly understood. The study of heme iron and N-nitroso metabolites, derived from the digestion of red meat, as possible inducers of oxidative stress and DNA damage, which is a major culprit of carcinogenic compounds and mutagenesis, has been pioneering. However, some other factors, like the time of cooking, temperature of cooking, and the direct or indirect contact of meat with flame during preparation, can also help in the formation and release of carcinogenic substances. This review aims to discuss the current evidence on the mechanistic associations between red meat intake and the activation of oncogenes that are central to tumorigenesis, and to generate new ideas for future studies. The synthesis and analysis of the existing evidence are a valuable resource for researchers and healthcare professionals trying to understand the complex interrelationships between dietary patterns, oncogenes, and the development of various cancers.

Indexed as

CancerMeatMolecular mechanismsOncogenes

Identifiers

PMID42668805
PMCPMC13525240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.