Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668855›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026

Prevalence of dysphagia and eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or type 2 inflammation: a cross-sectional multicenter screening study.

Martin Bäuerle, Jurij Maurer, Jagoda Pokryszka, Gottfried Novacek, Christian Primas, Lili Kazemi-Shirazi, Stefanie Dabsch, Adrian Frick, Walter Reinisch, Clemens Dejaco and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martin BäuerleDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0675-4048
Jurij MaurerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jagoda PokryszkaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gottfried NovacekDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian PrimasDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lili Kazemi-ShiraziDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefanie DabschDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Adrian FrickDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter ReinischDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens DejacoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael TraunerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Slagjana StoshikjDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine BangertDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sven SchneiderDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan WöhrlFloridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria.
Philipp SchreinerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-1925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, type-2 inflammation-driven disease causing dysphagia. Although patients with other type-2 inflammatory diseases (type-2 ID) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may have an increased risk of EoE, there is limited information about the prevalence of EoE in these specific populations. Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence of clinically relevant dysphagia as well as underlying EoE in patients with type-2 ID or IBD. Design: This is a cross-sectional, multicenter study of patients with type-2 ID (asthma, rhinosinusitis with polyposis nasi, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies) or IBD from the Medical University of Vienna and Floridsdorf Allergy Center. Methods: Patients were screened for esophageal dysphagia using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ). Relevant dysphagia was defined as a BEDQ score ⩾4, or having a history of bolus impaction or emergency department visit due to dysphagia within the past year. Endoscopy with esophageal biopsies was offered to all patients with relevant dysphagia to screen for EoE. Results: A total of 687 patients (45.9% female, median age 45 years, 53.9% with IBD, 48.5% with a type 2 ID) were screened. Overall, 8.9% ( Conclusion: While the prevalence of dysphagia among patients with type-2 ID and IBD may not exceed that of the general population, the prevalence of EoE in these populations may be higher than previously recognized.

Indexed as

dysphagiaeosinophilic esophagitisinflammatory bowel disease (IBD)type-2 inflammatory disease

Identifiers

PMID42668855
PMCPMC13525285

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.