ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Clinical Decision-Making and Guideline Alignment Among Brazilian Physical Therapists: Evidence From Standardized Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Vignettes.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Decision-Making and Guideline Alignment Among Brazilian Physical Therapists: Evidence From Standardized Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Vignettes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support evidence-based clinical decision-making. However, the extent to which physical therapists' clinical decisions align with guideline recommendations remains uncertain, particularly in Brazil.
objectiveTo evaluate the alignment of Brazilian physical therapists' clinical decisions with recommendations from CTS clinical practice guidelines and to examine whether general evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, self-reported guideline use, and condition-specific guideline knowledge are associated with this alignment.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire comprising two clinical vignettes representing mild and moderate CTS. Participants selected assessment and treatment strategies, which were scored using a weighted guideline-alignment system based on the strength of the supporting evidence. Scores were expressed as percentages. Between-group comparisons were performed using Welch's independent t-tests, and effect sizes were estimated using Cohen's d.
resultsA total of 282 physical therapists were included. Overall alignment with guideline recommendations was low (mean 46.2%, SD 10.7), with similarly low scores for assessment (45.9% ± 14.5) and intervention (46.5% ± 11.7). No significant associations were observed between guideline alignment and any of the investigated variables (all p > 0.05). Effect sizes were uniformly small. All participants selected at least one non-recommended intervention, and 66.7% selected at least one non-recommended assessment procedure.
conclusionClinical decisions made by Brazilian physical therapists showed limited alignment with CTS clinical practice guideline recommendations. General EBP knowledge, self-reported guideline use, and condition-specific guideline knowledge were not significantly associated with guideline alignment, and all observed effect sizes were small. These findings suggest that improving guideline implementation requires addressing factors beyond individual knowledge and highlight the importance of behavioural, organizational, and contextual determinants of clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.