ArticleJAMA cardiology2026
Prognostic Thresholds of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity may be underestimated by conventional (semi-)quantitative echocardiographic criteria derived from nonamyloid populations, given the restrictive, low-flow hemodynamics characteristic of the disease. Objectives: To derive and validate disease-specific prognostic, quantitative TR risk thresholds in ATTR-CM and to compare their prognostic performance with current guideline definitions and the Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium (TVARC) 5-grade extension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter cohort study was conducted from January 2016 to February 2026 at 8 high-volume tertiary referral centers across Austria, Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands, with data analysis February to May 2026. Patients with newly diagnosed ATTR-CM were enrolled and underwent standardized transthoracic echocardiography with blinded core laboratory quantitative analysis of echocardiography TR severity parameters (vena contracta width [VCW], effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA], and regurgitant volume [RegVol]). Exposures: TR severity defined by VCW, EROA, and RegVol from blinded core laboratory quantitative analysis and TR severity according to 2025 European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2020 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology, 2017 American Society of Echocardiography, and 2023 TVARC grading schemes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were all-cause mortality (primary end point) and time to first heart failure hospitalization (HFH; secondary end point). Results: A total of 1124 patients with newly diagnosed ATTR-CM were enrolled (derivation cohort: n = 745; validation cohort: n = 379). Median (IQR) patient age was 80 (75-84) years, and 260 patients (23.1%) were female. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 25.2 (12.2-43.2) months, 324 patients (28.8%) died and 251 (22.3%) experienced HFH. All TR metrics independently predicted both end points. Spline-derived thresholds delineated intermediate (VCW ≥3 mm; EROA ≥0.15 cm2; RegVol ≥10 mL), high (≥5 mm; ≥0.25 cm2; ≥20 mL), and extreme risk (≥8 mm; ≥0.50 cm2; ≥40 mL), with stepwise Kaplan-Meier separation in both cohorts. Whereas the guideline-based and TVARC schemes each classified 130 patients (11.6%) as having severe TR, the proposed framework classified 334 patients (29.7%) as having at least high or extreme risk (P < .001 for comparison to all other definitions). The framework was independently associated with both end points, with the highest point estimate among the schemes (mortality: hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23-1.62; HFH: HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.54), and showed superior discrimination over guideline definitions, particularly at later time points. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort study among patients with ATTR-CM, a validated, risk-based conceptual framework of echocardiographic parameters to quantify TR improved prediction of mortality and HFH over standard classification of TR severity, better reflecting restrictive low-flow pathophysiology and supporting disease-specific TR grading in ATTR-CM.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.