ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
No genome-wide correlations and little shared genetic architecture between reproductive life-history traits and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer risk.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, but the evolutionary processes shaping genetic variation in ER+ BC risk are poorly understood. Both evolutionary life-history theory and evidence from studies of individual ER+ BC risk variants suggest that increased genetic ER+ BC risk is associated with faster maturation, earlier reproduction, and/or increased reproductive success (i.e., there is a trade-off), but it is unclear how well this pattern is replicated when considering the polygenic architecture of these traits after controlling for potential biases. Here, we estimate genome-wide genetic correlations between ER+ BC risk and three reproductive traits (age at menarche, age at first birth, and the number of children) using genomic restricted maximum-likelihood analyses on Lifelines biobank data and linkage disequilibrium score regressions on population and family-based genome-wide association study data. Regardless of the data or method used, genetic correlations were low and not statistically significant. Further analyses decomposing genome-wide genetic variance into local regions detected only three loci exhibiting significant pleiotropy between ER+ BC risk and age at menarche, suggesting little shared genetic architecture between ER+ BC risk and reproductive traits. Thus, the role of life-history trade-offs in shaping ER+ BC risk in European populations appears, at most, small, and the evolutionary processes giving rise to this life-threatening disease remain unclear. Future studies could examine the impact of evolutionary mismatches in shaping ER+ BC risk, where conducting longitudinal studies on populations transitioning to reproductive patterns observed in contemporary European populations would be most useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671066What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.