Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671556›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Midline delta double-door decompression (MDDD), a novel strategy for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum via uni-portal noncoaxial spinal endoscopic surgery (UNSES): a case series.

Gao Wang, Yi-Hang Ma, Yang Qu, Zhao-Wei Chen, En Song, Bo-Yin Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gao WangDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yi-Hang MaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yang QuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhao-Wei ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, 96605th Hospital of PLA, Tonghua, China.
En SongDepartment of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. songen0427@163.com.
Bo-Yin ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. drboyin@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF) is the primary cause of thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS). Conventional decompression surgeries require surgical instruments to be inserted into the spinal canal, which is associated with risks such as dural tears, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and even spinal cord injury, potentially resulting in devastating neurological deficits. This study introduces a novel surgical technique named midline delta double-door decompression (MDDD), assesses its feasibility and safety and elaborates on its potential advantages.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 13 patients with TOLF who underwent MDDD from 2024 to January 2025. All the enrolled patients presented with symptoms of upper motor neuron injury, and some patients experienced complications of intermittent claudication. Centring on the core concept of the midline delta safe zone, a gradient progressive surgical strategy from the safe zone to the lesion boundary was adopted to standardize the surgical procedure. The double-door decompression mode was applied to achieve complete spinal cord decompression without any contact with the spinal cord. All patients received postoperative follow-up for more than 9 months. The modified JOA score for thoracic myelopathy (mJOA) was used to evaluate the improvement in clinical symptoms. Postoperative thoracic CT and MRI were performed to assess lesion resection efficacy and spinal stability.

resultsAll surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. No cases of intraoperative spinal cord injury, CSF leakage or severe postoperative neurological deterioration occurred. The mean operative time was 106.15 ± 8.58 min, with an average intraoperative blood loss of 143.08 ± 24.96 mL. The spinal canal anteroposterior diameter (SCAD) and cross-sectional area significantly increased postoperatively. At the mean 12.8-month follow-up, the mean mJOA score increased from 5.46 ± 0.78 preoperatively to 9.46 ± 0.78, with a mean neurological recovery rate (RR) of 57.72%. Eight patients achieved excellent outcomes, and five achieved good outcomes.

conclusionGuided by the midline delta safe zone, MDDD via UNSES achieves spinal cord decompression without intraspinal instrument invasion. All enrolled patients experienced effective spinal canal expansion and favourable neurological recovery at the midterm follow-up. The data support the short-term effectiveness of this procedure.

Indexed as

Minimally invasive spine surgeryThoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavumThoracic spinal stenosisUni-portal noncoaxial spinal endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.