Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675231›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

Accelerating iron biofortification in millets: progress, challenges, and future prospects.

A R Sree Rathna, Stanislaus Antony Ceasar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A R Sree RathnaDivision of Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Department of Biosciences, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Cochin, 683 104, Kerala, India.
Stanislaus Antony CeasarDivision of Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Department of Biosciences, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Cochin, 683 104, Kerala, India. antony_sm2003@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionIntegrating conventional breeding, omics, and CRISPR-based genome editing can overcome genetic and antinutrient constraints, enabling efficient iron biofortification of millets for sustainable and nutrition-secure food systems. Iron (Fe) deficiency remains one of the most widespread forms of micronutrient malnutrition. Biofortification of staple crops has emerged as a particularly sustainable and scalable strategy to combat this issue. Millets are nutrient-dense staple cereals with exceptional nutritional quality and climate resilience. However, genetic variations and the presence of antinutrients limit Fe content in millets, which highlights the necessity of advancing biofortification strategies. This review examines the present state of multi-dimensional strategies and discusses the future prospects for efficient iron biofortification in millets. We analyzed the efforts made for Fe biofortification in millets, ranging from conventional breeding practices to next-generation molecular approaches. Recent advances in omics have enhanced understanding of Fe uptake, transport, and storage in millets. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing is discussed for the regulated expression of key Fe-transporter genes and targeted knockout of genes responsible for antinutrients. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to develop high-yielding and Fe-rich millet varieties that can contribute to sustainable nutrition security.

Indexed as

BiofortificationIronMilletsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPlant BreedingIronBiofortificationCRISPR/CasIron deficiencyMilletsMulti-disciplinaryOmicsSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.