ArticleProgress in orthodontics2026
Can a cephalogram be used to estimate palatal suture maturity to inform expander selection.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe maturity of the mid-palatal suture (MPS) could largely determine the necessity of more invasive interventions for correcting transverse maxillary deficiency. CBCT, the most commonly used method for assessing MPS maturity, is not routinely available and exposes patients to higher levels of ionizing radiation than a cephalogram. Given the substantial number of morphological features contained in a cephalogram, this study aimed to estimate CBCT-defined MPS maturity using an entire cephalogram alone via deep learning (DL) algorithms.
methodsA total of 543 paired CBCT and cephalogram files available from two distinct hospital settings formed the internal and external datasets. Data augmentation and five-fold cross-validation strategies were applied. Six ResNet-based DL algorithms were initiated via transfer learning. The AdamW optimizer and an early-stopping strategy were employed during training. The models were subsequently tested on the held-out external dataset. The Grad-CAM technique was applied to offer insights into the models' decision-making process.
resultsAll algorithms exhibited promising classification performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.91 to 0.97. The models with the TKSGA module demonstrated better discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness than their baseline counterparts. Models integrated with the TKSGA module exhibited an interpretable decision pattern. The heatmaps revealed that morphological characteristics of patients' dentition, cervical vertebrae, and nasopharyngeal airway were primary areas of interest for the DL models.
conclusionsWhen CBCT imaging is unavailable or not justified, a lateral cephalogram coupled with advanced DL algorithms, could be considered as a supplementary tool to inform palatal expander selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.