Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675646›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.

Emilie Lambert, Christophe Nguyen, Sean Edward Dunn, Magali Gary-Bobo, Jérôme Lacombe, Justin Moser, Frédéric Zenhausern, Jean-Olivier Durand, Frédérique Cunin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emilie LambertICGM, CNRS, ENSCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1230-2635
Christophe NguyenIBMM, CNRS, ENSCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4539-1677
Sean Edward DunnCenter for Applied Nanobioscience and Medicine & Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Magali Gary-BoboIBMM, CNRS, ENSCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9641-212X
Jérôme LacombeCenter for Applied Nanobioscience and Medicine & Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-6332
Justin MoserHonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-9387
Frédéric ZenhausernCenter for Applied Nanobioscience and Medicine & Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-9118
Jean-Olivier DurandICGM, CNRS, ENSCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-2576
Frédérique CuninICGM, CNRS, ENSCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-8418

Funding

CNRS (IEA 2024-25 program)CNRS-University of Arizona (IRC PhD joint program)Desert Mountain CARE #40779University of Montpellier (EXPLORE#5 program)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims at exploring nanoparticle-based phototherapies of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults with an estimated incidence of 5-7 cases per million individuals per year, a disproportionately high metastatic risk and poor prognosis in advanced stages. UM exhibits unique biological and anatomical features, including an immune-privileged ocular microenvironment, the blood-ocular barrier, and high melanin content, contributing to therapeutic complexity. Current treatments, including radiotherapy, surgery, and systemic therapies, achieve local tumor control but remain limited by adverse effects, recurrence, and insufficient efficacy against metastatic disease. Laser-based therapies, including transpupillary thermotherapy and photodynamic therapy, offer minimally invasive alternatives. However, their performance is constrained by limited light penetration, melanin-induced uneven absorption, and incomplete tumor eradication. Recent advances in nanotechnology offer opportunities to overcome these limitations. Nanoparticle-based phototherapies can improve tumor targeting, photosensitizer delivery, and localized activation while reducing off-target effects. Multifunctional nanoplatforms may combine imaging, drug delivery, and synergistic therapies such as immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Although promising preclinical results highlight improved tumor control and antitumor responses, challenges related to safety, biodistribution, and clinical translation remain. This review discusses these challenges and future directions for optimized nanoplatforms to improve disease management and metastasis prevention.

Indexed as

laser therapynanomedicinenanoparticlesuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID42675646
PMCPMC13530356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.