ArticleMedicine2026
Causal relationships between oral-gut microbiome and bone neoplasm-related phenotypes: Insights from bidirectional Mendelian randomization.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human oral and gut microbiota are the 4 largest microbial communities in the body and play crucial roles in maintaining homeostasis and influencing disease. Observational studies have suggested links between these microbiota and bone neoplasm-related phenotypes, but establishing causality has been challenging due to confounding factors and reverse causality. We conducted a bidirectional, 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate evidence consistent with a potential causal association between the saliva and gut microbiota and various bone neoplasm-related phenotypes. Genetic instruments for saliva and gut microbiota were sourced from large genome-wide association studies. Inverse variance weighted was the primary MR method, supplemented by 4 other MR techniques. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger regression, were performed to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. In the forward MR analysis, Veillonella parvula from the saliva microbiota was associated with a decreased risk of bone and connective tissue neoplasms (β: -0.236, 95% CI: [-0.275, -0.197], P = 8.20E-33). MR analyses identified genetically predicted associations between several microbial taxa and bone neoplasm-related phenotypes. Reverse MR analyses showed that genetic liability to bone neoplasm-related phenotypes was associated with variation in the composition of the oral (e.g., Order Bacteroidales, Rothia mucilaginosa) and gut microbiota (e.g., Class Methanobacteria, Genus Eubacterium oxidoreducens group). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, as no statistical evidence of substantial heterogeneity or directional horizontal pleiotropy was detected. This study provides genetic evidence supporting a bidirectional causal relationship between specific saliva and gut microbiota and bone neoplasm-related phenotypes. Our findings identify several microbial taxa as potential candidates for future biomarker development and therapeutic investigation in bone neoplasm-related phenotypes. However, these genetically informed associations require further mechanistic, experimental, and prospective clinical validation before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.