Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675870›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2026

Boredom in Psychiatric Disorders: Another Dimensional Construct?

Riccardo Gurrieri, Matteo Gambini, Giorgia Sità, Elena Pescini, Federico Mucci, Donatella Marazziti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Riccardo GurrieriHealth Science Interdisciplinary Center, School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Matteo GambiniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8863-9353
Giorgia SitàDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elena PesciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico MucciDepartment of Mental Health, Lucca Zone, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy.
Donatella MarazzitiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoredom is increasingly emerging as a clinically relevant construct in psychiatry, yet it remains insufficiently integrated into contemporary psychopathological models. Rather than reflecting a trivial or purely situational state, boredom may be conceptualized as an aversive condition arising when individuals desire meaningful engagement but are unable to sustain it. This review examines boredom across major psychiatric disorders, with particular attention to its neurophysiological, neurobiological, and clinical correlates.

methodsA narrative synthesis of conceptual, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, autonomic, and clinical literature on boredom was conducted, considering findings across major psychiatric disorders. FINDING: Available evidence suggests that boredom is associated with alterations in attentional regulation, motivational processing, and internally oriented cognition. EEG studies report increased alpha activity, altered theta dynamics, and reduced indices of cognitive control, whereas functional neuroimaging findings highlight greater involvement of the default mode network and reduced engagement of fronto-parietal control systems. Autonomic data further indicate that boredom is not a uniform low-arousal state, but a dynamic psychophysiological condition characterized by fluctuating patterns of disengagement and re-engagement. Clinically, boredom appears to cut across diagnostic categories, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic spectrum conditions, addictions, eating disorders, personality disorders, and suicidality. Across these conditions, it may function both as a vulnerability factor and as a mechanism contributing to maladaptive coping, impaired functioning, and poorer treatment adherence.

conclusionOverall, the literature supports the view that boredom may represent a dimensional and transdiagnostic construct of potential relevance for psychiatric research and practice. A more systematic assessment of boredom may improve psychopathological characterization and help identify novel therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

BoredomBrainMental DisordersAttentionHumansboredomdefault mode networkpsychiatrypsychopathologytransdiagnostic construct

Identifiers

PMID42675870
PMCPMC13530392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.